Given an array of n integers, find the 3 elements such that a[i] < a[j] < a[k] and i < j < k in 0(n) time. If there are multiple such triplets, then print any one of them.
Examples:
Input: arr[] = {12, 11, 10, 5, 6, 2, 30} Output: 5, 6, 30 Input: arr[] = {1, 2, 3, 4} Output: 1, 2, 3 OR 1, 2, 4 OR 2, 3, 4 Input: arr[] = {4, 3, 2, 1} Output: No such triplet
Source: Amazon Interview Question
Hint: Use Auxiliary Space
Solution:
1) Create an auxiliary array smaller[0..n-1]. smaller[i] should store the index of a number which is smaller than arr[i] and is on left side of arr[i]. smaller[i] should contain -1 if there is no such element.
2) Create another auxiliary array greater[0..n-1]. greater[i] should store the index of a number which is greater than arr[i] and is on right side of arr[i]. greater[i] should contain -1 if there is no such element.
3) Finally traverse both smaller[] and greater[] and find the index i for which both smaller[i] and greater[i] are not -1.
1) Create an auxiliary array smaller[0..n-1]. smaller[i] should store the index of a number which is smaller than arr[i] and is on left side of arr[i]. smaller[i] should contain -1 if there is no such element.
2) Create another auxiliary array greater[0..n-1]. greater[i] should store the index of a number which is greater than arr[i] and is on right side of arr[i]. greater[i] should contain -1 if there is no such element.
3) Finally traverse both smaller[] and greater[] and find the index i for which both smaller[i] and greater[i] are not -1.
#include<stdio.h> // A function to fund a sorted subsequence of size 3 void find3Numbers( int arr[], int n) { int max = n-1; //Index of maximum element from right side int min = 0; //Index of minimum element from left side int i; // Create an array that will store index of a smaller // element on left side. If there is no smaller element // on left side, then smaller[i] will be -1. int *smaller = new int [n]; smaller[0] = -1; // first entry will always be -1 for (i = 1; i < n; i++) { if (arr[i] <= arr[min]) { min = i; smaller[i] = -1; } else smaller[i] = min; } // Create another array that will store index of a // greater element on right side. If there is no greater // element on right side, then greater[i] will be -1. int *greater = new int [n]; greater[n-1] = -1; // last entry will always be -1 for (i = n-2; i >= 0; i--) { if (arr[i] >= arr[max]) { max = i; greater[i] = -1; } else greater[i] = max; } // Now find a number which has both a greater number on // right side and smaller number on left side for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { if (smaller[i] != -1 && greater[i] != -1) { printf ( "%d %d %d" , arr[smaller[i]], arr[i], arr[greater[i]]); return ; } } // If we reach number, then there are no such 3 numbers printf ( "No such triplet found" ); // Free the dynamically alloced memory to avoid memory leak delete [] smaller; delete [] greater; return ; } // Driver program to test above function int main() { int arr[] = {12, 11, 10, 5, 6, 2, 30}; int n = sizeof (arr)/ sizeof (arr[0]); find3Numbers(arr, n); return 0; } |
Output:
5 6 30
Time Complexity: O(n)
Auxliary Space: O(n)
Auxliary Space: O(n)
Exercise:
1. Find a subsequence of size 3 such that arr[i] < arr[j] > arr[k].
2. Find a sorted subsequence of size 4 in linear time
1. Find a subsequence of size 3 such that arr[i] < arr[j] > arr[k].
2. Find a sorted subsequence of size 4 in linear time
Please write comments if you find anything incorrect, or you want to share more information about the topic discussed above
No comments:
Post a Comment